
I’m up in Portland this weekend for the National Writers Workshop. It’s an important event, to be sure, filled with such notable journalists as Pulitzer Prize winners Jacqui Banaszynski and Diana Sugg, Mark Kramer, the founding director of the Nieman Program on Narrative Journalism, and Jack Hart, the venerable writing coach for the Oregonian. While the conference has been a little too newspaper-focused for my tastes, there’ve been several important lessons and reminders I’ve received – and that’s just in the first day.
Among the most advice was that of Jack Hart, who told the audience that a good narrative story requires more than just an interesting topic. A narrative story must have a theme. There must be a reason for writing about a topic, a big idea, a universal truth. “Say something important about how the world works.”
Hart gave the example of soccer moms. If you want to write about the topic, you’ll need a theme, which could be as simple as “Non-working mothers drive community.” Once you’ve got the universal truth or the theme, you can focus your writing and it won’t simply turn out to be a report about an interesting topic, which Hart said was just an invitation for a reporter to empty his notebook on the page.
Hart said he actually types the theme at the top of the page before writing and then keeps it there as a reminder until the first draft is complete.
Another helpful tip from Hart – if you’re looking for story ideas, you might try the book Famous First Facts. It’s apparently filled with exotic facts and stories.
From Lance Williams and Mark Fainaru-Wada, investigative reporters for the San Francisco Chronicle and authors of the book Game of Shadows, when working on investigative stories, be explicit with the sources about what specifically you’re looking for. When you do, someone is likely to provide the information.
Deborah Nelson, who won the Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting in 1997, also offered up advice about investigative reporting. One of her best pieces of advice was to go to the subject of the investigation early on in the reporting and return often. They often prove to be one of the best sources of information for an investigative piece. If an individual or company is reticent, read them or e-mail them a draft of the story and tell them this is what the story is going to say unless I can get your side. They usually respond pretty quickly after that.
Finally, Nelson said that if you want to affect change with your stories, you’ll need to name names, name the policies that are at the heart of the matter and be specific. When you do this and write a compelling story some pretty amazing changes can occur.
Nelson also recommended the article
“The Blood-Cancer Experiment” by Duff Wilson and David Heath, as an example of great investigative reporting and writing.
Well that’s all for tonight. But if tomorrow’s presenters are anywhere near as good as today’s I’ll have another installment of writing tips for you.
For more information on the National Writers Workshop or for tips on writing visit the
Poynter Institute Web site.